Varanasi:
The Archeological Survey of India (ASI) has resumed its survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi to find out if it was constructed over a Hindu temple. The mosque committee has challenged the survey within the Supreme Court docket.
Listed below are 10 factors on this huge story:
-
The Allahabad Excessive Court docket on Thursday gave its nod for a ‘scientific survey’ of the mosque saying that it was warranted within the curiosity of justice.
-
“Within the opinion of the Court docket, the scientific survey/investigation proposed is critical within the curiosity of justice and shall profit the plaintiffs and defendants alike and are available in support of the trial courtroom to reach at a simply choice. The (trial) courtroom was justified in passing the impugned order,” the bench mentioned in its 16-page verdict.
-
A number of BJP leaders welcomed the excessive courtroom verdict, saying the “reality” concerning the temple on the website will now come out.
-
The mosque committee has challenged the ruling in Supreme Court docket, a request that can be heard later right now.
-
One of many events from the Hindu facet has additionally filed a caveat within the Supreme Court docket saying no orders be handed with out listening to them within the matter.
-
The Hindu petitioners contend {that a} temple existed earlier on the website and it was demolished within the seventeenth Century on the orders of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.
-
Earlier, the Supreme Court docket had barred any survey contained in the mosque complicated. The mosque’s ‘wazukhana’ — the place a construction that the petitioners claimed was a ‘shivling’ — is not going to be throughout the ambit of the recent survey in line with the Supreme Court docket order.
-
The ‘scientific survey’ was ordered by a Varanasi district courtroom on July 21 after 4 girls filed a petition claiming that it was the one solution to decide if the landmark mosque was constructed after razing a Hindu temple.
-
The survey began on July 24, but it surely was stayed inside hours by the Supreme Court docket after the mosque committee approached it.
-
The mosque committee had argued that the construction is over a thousand years outdated and any digging may destabilise it, resulting in its collapse. The committee had additionally argued that any such survey is in violation of current legal guidelines round spiritual locations.
Featured Video Of The Day
“Married For 45 Years”: Veep’s Reply To Congress Chief’s ‘Offended’ Jibe
